I'm confused on one point. Why would a new canonical notation be preferable to, say, also fully supporting an alternative general notation (like Shriram's p4p, or a derivative thereof) or even multiple notations in addition to retaining good old s-expressions?
The idea would be that you could transform freely and readably between alternative notations, enabling round-tripping without degradation. I imagine that effectively providing tooling, syntax-extension, good error messages, and documentation across multiple notations would be (ahem) challenging, but so long as we're dreaming big ... Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFKxZVV-njHNCCLDP-RsDq%2BjbXrOGpOnaEp9Ob4ugTbdtmckAw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
