I'm confused on one point. Why would a new canonical notation be preferable to, say, also fully supporting an alternative general notation (like Shriram's p4p, or a derivative thereof) or even multiple notations in addition to retaining good old s-expressions?
The idea would be that you could transform freely and readably between alternative notations, enabling round-tripping without degradation. I imagine that effectively providing tooling, syntax-extension, good error messages, and documentation across multiple notations would be (ahem) challenging, but so long as we're dreaming big ... Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFKxZVV-njHNCCLDP-RsDq%2BjbXrOGpOnaEp9Ob4ugTbdtmckAw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
