Hendrik Boom writes: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:52:37PM -0700, Maria Gabriela Guimarães wrote: >> >> Does Racket wants to be popular in the industry? Then Racket must focus on >> being a language-oriented programming ecosystem on a popular VM, like the >> ErlangVM, the JVM, and the WebAssemblyVM. This means to stop working on the >> RacketVM, if there's such a thing, and to start moving Racket's >> language-oriented programming features into these popular VMs. > > There may be performance advantages to the Racket VM, so I wouldn't > stop developing it. But adding those other popular VMs may well be a > win. > > -- hendrik
The work that Matthew Flatt is doing on Racket-on-Chez should be opening up the possibility of running Racket on multiple other foundations, is my understanding from conversations in the past. So I don't think we need to pivot, since opening up the possibility for this is already on track. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87d0i814yk.fsf%40dustycloud.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
