At Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT), Brian Adkins wrote: > One thing that's still bothering me is the admission that if Racket > was already popular enough we wouldn't be considering the syntax > change. This was an answer to a question in a live setting, and I am > prone to mis-interpreting/understanding, so I very much want to cut > Matthew some slack since he only had a few seconds to reply.
Indeed, I would not have intended to answer simply "yes" to the question "would you stay with the same syntax if Racket were already popular enough?". > Maybe the core team can take some time and clearly articulate the > goal(s) for Racket2 from which everything else flows? Working on it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190718185624.E05FB65011E%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
