On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 08:54:41AM -0700, Brian Adkins wrote: > This may seem like a nitpick, but I think there would be a *huge* shift in > attitudes if the suggestion for an infix syntax was framed in a similar > manner to Typed Racket as opposed to Racket 2. The latter seems to imply a > premature conclusion, where the former proposes a question to be answered > by the community i.e. if people do flock to #lang infix, then the people > will have spoken. Let #lang infix win by merit, not by decree!
And, presumaby we'll also get #lang typed-infix > > Required re-reading: "The Evolution of Lisp" > https://www.dreamsongs.com/Files/HOPL2-Uncut.pdf -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190720021517.fufbqjrzb2s6cpoe%40topoi.pooq.com.
