This may seem like a nitpick, but I think there would be a *huge* shift in attitudes if the suggestion for an infix syntax was framed in a similar manner to Typed Racket as opposed to Racket 2. The latter seems to imply a premature conclusion, where the former proposes a question to be answered by the community i.e. if people do flock to #lang infix, then the people will have spoken. Let #lang infix win by merit, not by decree!
Required re-reading: "The Evolution of Lisp" https://www.dreamsongs.com/Files/HOPL2-Uncut.pdf Thanks to @rplevy for the reminder of that paper. Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/6c9ef7be-6172-4bfb-b5ac-5a2064921325%40googlegroups.com.
