This may seem like a nitpick, but I think there would be a *huge* shift in attitudes if the suggestion for an infix syntax was framed in a similar manner to Typed Racket as opposed to Racket 2. The latter seems to imply a premature conclusion, where the former proposes a question to be answered by the community i.e. if people do flock to #lang infix, then the people will have spoken. Let #lang infix win by merit, not by decree!
Required re-reading: "The Evolution of Lisp" https://www.dreamsongs.com/Files/HOPL2-Uncut.pdf Thanks to @rplevy for the reminder of that paper. Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/6c9ef7be-6172-4bfb-b5ac-5a2064921325%40googlegroups.com.
