On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:27:09 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/20 12:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > v1 was "Replace current_machine by qdev_get_machine()": > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg669611.html > > > > But Markus objected, see: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg670122.html > > and older discussion: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg611338.html > > > > This series salvage patches from v1, and add other trivial cleanups. > > > > Can the ARM/PPC/S390 patches could go via their own tree, and the > > rest via Paolo's 'misc' tree? > > I think they're trivial enough so (with the exception of patch 7) I have > queued them. I had already queued the s390 patch; let's just see who gets their pull req out first, I can also unqueue it again.
