On 1/21/20 1:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes:
v1 was "Replace current_machine by qdev_get_machine()":
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg669611.html
But Markus objected, see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg670122.html
and older discussion:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg611338.html
This series salvage patches from v1, and add other trivial cleanups.
Can the ARM/PPC/S390 patches could go via their own tree, and the
rest via Paolo's 'misc' tree?
Supersedes: <20200109152133.23649-1-phi...@redhat.com>
Separating off uncontroversial patches is always a good idea. These all
look okay to me on first glance, with one minor remark on PATCH 7. I
think you got or are likely to get competent review for all of them. If
you need me to have a closer look, just ask.
Good :) Thanks!
