Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > v1 was "Replace current_machine by qdev_get_machine()": > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg669611.html > > But Markus objected, see: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg670122.html > and older discussion: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg611338.html > > This series salvage patches from v1, and add other trivial cleanups. > > Can the ARM/PPC/S390 patches could go via their own tree, and the > rest via Paolo's 'misc' tree? > > Supersedes: <20200109152133.23649-1-phi...@redhat.com>
Separating off uncontroversial patches is always a good idea. These all look okay to me on first glance, with one minor remark on PATCH 7. I think you got or are likely to get competent review for all of them. If you need me to have a closer look, just ask. Thanks!
