On 18/12/18 20:13, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 06:15:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 18/12/18 16:57, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-18 16:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>>> Hi Paolo, Eduardo, >>>>> >>>>> On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>>>>> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>>>>>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as orphan. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Remove the qemu-devel@nongnu.org entry because the list is always >>>>>>>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>>>>>>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>>>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>>>>>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported >>>>>>>> F: scripts/coverity-model.c >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CPU >>>>>>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>>>>>> -S: Supported >>>>>>>> +S: Orphan >>>>>>>> F: qom/cpu.c >>>>>>>> F: include/qom/cpu.h >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think that's accurate. Simply there's not much going on. If >>>>>>> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do something >>>>>>> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me). >>>>> >>>>> I followed Markus suggestion from >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.html: >>>>> >>>>> If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, >>>>> we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list), >>>>> or downgrade to S: Orphan. >>>> >>>> I agree with Markus and Philippe. Having "S: Supported" but no names >>>> available is just confusing. So either put a maintainer name in here, or >>>> downgrade to "Orphan". >>> >>> I volunteer to maintain it, but I don't want to be the only >>> maintainer. Any other volunteer? >> >> I can volunteer since I'd take the patches anyway. We can also mark it >> as Odd Fixes, and also make it a single thing with all of qom/ and >> include/qom/. > > Actually, I consider qom/cpu.c distinct from QOM core, and I was > planning to move it to hw/cpu, and add hw/cpu/core.c to the same > section. > > Anyway, I guess this means you're also volunteering to be listed > as QOM maintainer?
Igor and Daniel, would you co-maintain or review it? Paolo
