Hi Paolo, Eduardo, On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as orphan. >>> >>> Remove the qemu-devel@nongnu.org entry because the list is always >>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644 >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported >>> F: scripts/coverity-model.c >>> >>> CPU >>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>> -S: Supported >>> +S: Orphan >>> F: qom/cpu.c >>> F: include/qom/cpu.h >>> >>> >> >> I don't think that's accurate. Simply there's not much going on. If >> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do something >> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me).
I followed Markus suggestion from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.html: If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list), or downgrade to S: Orphan. > > Should we add our names to that section, or is it OK to leave it > as "S: Supported" even if it doesn't have any official > maintainers?
