On 2018-12-18 16:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Paolo, Eduardo, > > On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as orphan. >>>> >>>> Remove the qemu-devel@nongnu.org entry because the list is always >>>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section. >>>> >>>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644 >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported >>>> F: scripts/coverity-model.c >>>> >>>> CPU >>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>> -S: Supported >>>> +S: Orphan >>>> F: qom/cpu.c >>>> F: include/qom/cpu.h >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I don't think that's accurate. Simply there's not much going on. If >>> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do something >>> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me). > > I followed Markus suggestion from > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.html: > > If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, > we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list), > or downgrade to S: Orphan.
I agree with Markus and Philippe. Having "S: Supported" but no names available is just confusing. So either put a maintainer name in here, or downgrade to "Orphan". Thomas