On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 2018-12-18 16:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Hi Paolo, Eduardo, > > > > On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >>>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as orphan. > >>>> > >>>> Remove the qemu-devel@nongnu.org entry because the list is always > >>>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section. > >>>> > >>>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >>>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644 > >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported > >>>> F: scripts/coverity-model.c > >>>> > >>>> CPU > >>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > >>>> -S: Supported > >>>> +S: Orphan > >>>> F: qom/cpu.c > >>>> F: include/qom/cpu.h > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I don't think that's accurate. Simply there's not much going on. If > >>> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do something > >>> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me). > > > > I followed Markus suggestion from > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.html: > > > > If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, > > we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list), > > or downgrade to S: Orphan. > > I agree with Markus and Philippe. Having "S: Supported" but no names > available is just confusing. So either put a maintainer name in here, or > downgrade to "Orphan".
I volunteer to maintain it, but I don't want to be the only maintainer. Any other volunteer? -- Eduardo
