On 03/29/2014 01:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > It seems like it might be worth abstracting out "give me the byte > difference between these two code pointers" rather than having > inline (uintptr_t)codeptr1 - (uintptr_t)codeptr2, but I dunno.
Yeah, I dithered about that. I couldn't come up with a good name that adequately described what I wanted that was really any shorter than just having the casts. > Is there a better name than 'tcg_itype' ? Putting 'type' in the > name of a type is a bit redundant, and suggests it contains > a type rather than an insn. I'm open to suggestions there as well. On x86 and ia64, it won't hold an entire insn, so "tcg_insn" seemed inappropriate. r~
