Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> writes: > On 03/29/2014 01:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> It seems like it might be worth abstracting out "give me the byte >> difference between these two code pointers" rather than having >> inline (uintptr_t)codeptr1 - (uintptr_t)codeptr2, but I dunno. > > Yeah, I dithered about that. I couldn't come up with a good name that > adequately described what I wanted that was really any shorter than just > having > the casts. > >> Is there a better name than 'tcg_itype' ? Putting 'type' in the >> name of a type is a bit redundant, and suggests it contains >> a type rather than an insn. > > I'm open to suggestions there as well. On x86 and ia64, it won't hold an > entire insn, so "tcg_insn" seemed inappropriate. <snip>
tcg_insn_stream? -- Alex Bennée
