>>> Is there a better name than 'tcg_itype' ? Putting 'type' in the
>>> name of a type is a bit redundant, and suggests it contains
>>> a type rather than an insn.
>>
>> I'm open to suggestions there as well. On x86 and ia64, it won't hold an
>> entire insn, so "tcg_insn" seemed inappropriate.
>
> tcg_{isa,insn}_{part,elt} ?tcg_insn_unit ? Jay.
