On 08/01/2014 23:34, rdst...@mac.com wrote:
I'm so sorry for the mess in my post above, I apologize to all, I accidentally 
hit return ...

I just meant to say that internet programming using ASCII urls is so common and 
important that it hurts that Python 3 makes it so much harder. It sure would be 
great if Python 3 could be improved to allow such programming to be done using 
ASCII urls without requiring all the unicode overhead.

Armin is right. Calling his post a rant doesn't help.


I disagree. If you want to make friends and influence people, your opening sentence is not "It's becoming increasingly harder to have reasonable discussions about the differences between Python 2 and 3 because one language is dead and the other is actively developed." If Python 2 is dead, why are the core developers wasting their time committing patches to the Python 2 source code, because they have nothing better to do?

--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to