On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:02 PM, wilk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11-12-2014, Chris Rossi wrote: > > --f46d0434c0baf928a70509f0bfe4 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > Ok, less snarky version--one doesn't know the future, but the community > > around Pyramid is cohesive enough that it should endure for some time to > > come. Enough businesses are using it in their core infrastructure that > > it's unlikely the community would just shrivel up overnight. The reason > > there are so few features slated for future release is because Pyramid, > > itself, is starting to feel finished. It does what it does really well > and > > we don't feel that we're wanting for features. The bulk of new > development > > is around layers on top or add-ons for Pyramid--projects that contribute > to > > the Pyramid ecosystem, but not necessarily to Pyramid core. Because, > > really, core already has most of the features anyone wants at that layer. > > Can we say the same about zodb ? > I'm trying zodb with traversal for a cms and it's really "made for it". > So much that now i don't understand how i could do without it ! But the > zodb project is... how to say ?... worse than pyramid about > marketing ;-) > > True. It's not going anywhere, though, and there are people still developing it. There is not much in the way of documentation, but it does have a rich oral tradition.
> Can substanced be considered as a sort of crud for zodb ? > If you want to, sure. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
