On 11-12-2014, Chris Rossi wrote: > --f46d0434c0baf928a70509f0bfe4 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Ok, less snarky version--one doesn't know the future, but the community > around Pyramid is cohesive enough that it should endure for some time to > come. Enough businesses are using it in their core infrastructure that > it's unlikely the community would just shrivel up overnight. The reason > there are so few features slated for future release is because Pyramid, > itself, is starting to feel finished. It does what it does really well and > we don't feel that we're wanting for features. The bulk of new development > is around layers on top or add-ons for Pyramid--projects that contribute to > the Pyramid ecosystem, but not necessarily to Pyramid core. Because, > really, core already has most of the features anyone wants at that layer.
Can we say the same about zodb ? I'm trying zodb with traversal for a cms and it's really "made for it". So much that now i don't understand how i could do without it ! But the zodb project is... how to say ?... worse than pyramid about marketing ;-) Can substanced be considered as a sort of crud for zodb ? -- William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
