Why not just cut to the chase and call them "examples". They can then be fully fledged working applications, and users can be advised to copy them to their own directory structures before continuing. That's probably what everybody does anyway, right?
Steve On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Mark Ramm <mark.mchristen...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Joe Dallago <jd.dall...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yah the term 'scaffold' is used in a number of rails-like php frameworks > as > > well. I think it would be more easily recognized than skeleton. -1 > > skeleton. +1 scaffold. > > Also agreed on scaffold being a more recognizable and actually more > accurate term. > > --Mark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
