On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > "Template" has been a problem for years. Even if people can figure it > out, it's cumbersome to write in documentation and tutorials where you > have to explain that a template (skeleton) is not a template (file) > although some of its files are templates. And the phrase "application > template" is long and cumbersome when you have to repeat it many > times.
Ah, good point. I guess I'm too used to explaining things in person. ;) So any reason it *shouldnt* be called 'scaffolding' given its already a well known name that people already associate with this exact thing? I mean, I can see how 'blueprint' can technically be a more accurate term, but existing re-use of the name and lack of anyone already associating it with this seems like a point against it. Cheers, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
