Michael Oke, II wrote: > An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in > 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time > and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
Maybe I'm not proficient in the English language? What does the phrase "An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in 1933?" mean? What does an "attempt to one person's asylum request" mean? What does "violations with Germany in 1933" mean? Is it that someone not mentioned with the complicity of someone named "Germany" raped people in 1933? Honestly, I can not communicate with you if you keep using this language that looks like English but is not. Can we please go back to English? > > Nobody is saying that I should be consulted about which laws should and > should not be followed but another twisted example from you. You seemed to imply that defying a legal order was *always* wrong. Is that so, or did I misconstrue your words? Is it *always* wrong, or are there some "legal order" that may and should be defied? And if there are, who may decide which ones should be defied or not? Very interested in your philosophy. > > And of course you didn't follow the link. Why bother reading before > commenting, that just allows common sense to invade and you aren't about > to let that happen. Maybe because I'm commenting on the consistency of your comments and not on the actual link? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
