Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Michael Oke, II wrote: >> Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >>> Michael Oke, II wrote: >>>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >>>>> So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my >>>>> inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed? >>>>> >>>> Incorrect, again. I was communicating properly and just dropped a >>>> single word that, while relevant, did not turn my entire statement to >>>> mush. >>> Right. >>> >> Absolutely, but I don't expect you to be able to comprehend that. > > Right. > >>>>>> Hmmm, by my upbringing, it is always wrong to defy a legal order. That >>>>>> doesn't mean that you cannot protest same but that is a different issue. >>>>> So in Nazi Germany, were you a German, you would have protested the laws >>>>> that sent Jews to concentration camps but you would have obeyed the law >>>>> and do what you must as a law abiding citizen to comply with it.(so my >>>>> "attempt to compare" was not much off the target) >>>>> >>>> I wasn't in Nazi Germany nor a German at that time so I cannot tell you >>>> what I would have done. >>>> >>> Chicken! >>> >> Hardly. Anybody that would tell you that they know what they would do >> in a place and time that they weren't is, at best, a liar. At worst, >> they are a fool. I have no idea how I would have reacted had I been >> born and raised during that period. Unlike many others, my response >> demonstrates more courage than you can understand. > > So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in > concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concentration > camps). Would you in this place and time abide by them and help the > police enforce them as any good citizen would? > Easy question if you want to answer it. > It's not an easy question at all but that fact wouldn't register in your head.
>>>> Unlike you, I have no hearing aid nor any need for one. My wife might >>>> disagree with that statement at times but that is okay. My ability to >>>> comprehend what you are typing far outstrips your ability to spin your >>>> yarns but, by all means, please feel free to continue. I'm assuming >>>> that such a freedom exists in your country of course. >>> Yes, of course. We don't have Patriot acts. >>> >> Not sure what that has to do with my question but okay. >> > > It's a simple English statement, "we don't have Patriot Acts". If you > can't understand plain English then maybe you should remove yourself > from this list and go to some redneck speaking list. > Simple statement or not, it still has no relevance. As for the balance of your rambling, I'll ignore that. ::michael _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
