Michael Oke, II wrote: > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my >> inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed? >> > Incorrect, again. I was communicating properly and just dropped a > single word that, while relevant, did not turn my entire statement to > mush.
Right. >>> Hmmm, by my upbringing, it is always wrong to defy a legal order. That >>> doesn't mean that you cannot protest same but that is a different issue. >> So in Nazi Germany, were you a German, you would have protested the laws >> that sent Jews to concentration camps but you would have obeyed the law >> and do what you must as a law abiding citizen to comply with it.(so my >> "attempt to compare" was not much off the target) >> > I wasn't in Nazi Germany nor a German at that time so I cannot tell you > what I would have done. > Chicken! >>>> Maybe because I'm commenting on the consistency of your comments and not >>>> on the actual link? >>> You are the one that said that you didn't follow the link, indicating, >>> as always, that you were commenting on it >> Lets try a bit louder "I WAS COMMENTING ON THE CONSISTENCY OF YOUR >> COMMMENTS AND NOT ON THE ACTUAL LINK", so obviously I was not >> "commenting on it". You might try and raise the volume of your hearing >> aid if that's the problem, I cannot shout all day. >> (if that's not the problem then there's an inherent difficulty with your >> reading skills and nothing can be done about it) >> > > You were attempting to comment on something that you never read and have > since attempted to spin your failings as something else. So besides your obvious virtues you also read minds. Nice! > > Unlike you, I have no hearing aid nor any need for one. My wife might > disagree with that statement at times but that is okay. My ability to > comprehend what you are typing far outstrips your ability to spin your > yarns but, by all means, please feel free to continue. I'm assuming > that such a freedom exists in your country of course. Yes, of course. We don't have Patriot acts. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
