That's the first comment Ive heard like that. VISTA was junk that looked nice but was inferior in every other way. Win7 is vista look-alive but performs like XP and with all the nice goodies and a pleasant interface. This version of windows is actually as good as they claim.
-----Original Message----- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hill Sent: Tuesday, 26 January 2010 6:25 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: I can't believe this On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Sytze de Boer <sytze.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > A client brought in a 2 year old vaio laptop > >From cold boot to wordpad doc, 5 minutes > > Replaced the hard drive (80 gig ssd), installed Windows 7 > > >From cold boot to wordpad doc, 23 secs. > That included 9 secs for Bios start up > > Yeah ok, no other software installed yet (AV etc) > > I want one, NOW You would probably find that XP would be just as fast with a fresh install. I've been using Windows 7 for a few months now and to be honest I find zero improvements over XP... -- Paul [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004e01ca9e60$c91906b0$5b4b14...@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
