* Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > there is this IETF draft which asks for support SMTPS (aka really, > now), that is Implicit TLS via dedicated port for SMTP.
Are you referring to [1], i.e. your own draft? "Nenne Ross und Reiter." [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nurpmeso-smtp-tls-srv/02/ > only one EHLO, no STARTTLS roundtrip. For the cost of an additional DNS lookup, plus the cost of setting up the necessary RR, plus the cost for opening another firewall port. I see only additional work and hassle, but neither gain nor advantage over the existing STARTTLS. The way I percieve it, this attempt to get rid of STARTTLS is a "solution" for an imaginary problem. > Jeremy Harris of course said that it will not become part of the > regular "codebase unless there is obvious community interest", and > so i am asking whether postfix would be interested in this. I am not interested, but of course I don't speak for Postfix or the community in general. -Ralph _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
