* Marvin Renich via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> [241018 08:14]: > My apologies! I had explicitly set Reply-To, and expected the mailing > list software to _not_ replace it.
Okay, it seems that the list software _adds_ the original sender to the existing Reply-To header. So if I don't set Reply-To, it just has my email. > Wietse: Can the mailing list software be changed in two separate ways: > > 1. Do not add the original sender to Reply-To. It is expected that > someone sending to a mailing list is also reading the list unless they > explicitly state otherwise. A Reply-To that includes both the mailing > list and the original sender causes the original sender to get duplicate > emails of every reply. This is contrary to long-standing mailing list > etiquette. > > 2. If an email to the list has an explicit Reply-To, do not replace it. Wietse: Ignore 1 above. Please just change it to respect a specified Reply-To without modification (2 above). From RFC 5322: The originator fields also provide the information required when replying to a message. When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the reply. One of the original intended uses of Reply-To, AIUI, was if the sender did not want replies to go to the From address (e.g. sending from ISP-mandated email, but replies should go to vanity email). > Thank you. > > ...Marvin _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
