Dnia 15.10.2024 o godz. 12:36:12 Nico Schottelius via Postfix-users pisze: > > You got a point there, there would be a barrier between classic email > and "secure email" (or whatever term comes to one's mind). > > Actually a bit similar as the split between the IPv6 and IPv4 world - > hence my argument for going IPv6 only might be even more valid.
Your comparison to IPv6 vs IPv4 isn't very good, as everybody tries to do their best to level the barrier between IPv6 and IPv4, not strenghten it. That's why dual stack still is (and probably will be in the foreseeable future) still a thing. Nobody is setting up IPv6-only servers, unless they are experimental servers meant to be used only by closed group of users, and not generally reachable from the Internet. Who would like to setup eg. an IPv6-only website, thus cutting themselves off of half of the Internet? As for ISPs and client connections, for example my home Internet connection *is* IPv6-only. But thanks to gateways implemented by the ISP, I can reach IPv4 addresses without any problems. Were there no gateways, I would complain to the ISP that I can't reach may sites, and if they don't change this, I would stop using that ISP. Do you plan to add to your system some kind of gateways between the "secure email" and the "normal email" world? If yes, that kinda defeats the purpose you are building it for. If no, then you are cutting yourself from half of the Internet. I don't see a third option here... -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
