On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:03:48PM +0900, Nico Schottelius via Postfix-users 
wrote:

> We at ungleich [0] plan to switch towards IPv6 only mail services

A substantial fraction of email domains are IPv4-only?  Why is IPv6-only
a good idea at this time?

> in the near future and we would like to "revolutionise" the way how we
> handle mail while we do this step. This mail is to discuss the idea
> and get some feedback from the community of other postfix users.

Sounds like marketing getting ahead of sound engineering.  These are not
new ideas, they just don't work...

> - All participating mail servers are IPv6 only [1]
> - Every participating entity has an OpenGPG keypair [2]

Unlikely to scale.

> - Every mail server of an entity only accepts email, if the sending
>   mail server's public key is signed by a trusted key

Any system that is open and scales will have bad actors.  If the system
never becomes popular, it is irrelevant.  If it becomes popular, the bad
actors will be early adopters.

> - Additionally there might be a negative / exception in this stating:
>   A) if the key is X, refuse mail
>   - Note that this cannot apply to signatures, because anyone can sign a
>     key and if we were to refuse a key based on its signatures, a
>     blacklisted key could render valid keys invalid

You're proposing something similar to <https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt>.

> The underlying assumption is as follows:
> 
> - This network of trusted entities starts very small
>   (in our case we sign a couple of friendly other ISPs in Switzerland, were 
> we are located at)

If this is a small club, there are surely simpler designs.  You could
model yourself on EMIG (Email Made in Germany).

> - Those ISPs do the same, so the network grows
> - Eventually multiple networks join, when the first participant of
>   network A starts to sign a key of network B
> - A decentralise approach as this one will help to build a more stable 
> Internet

The web of trust does not scale.

> - I'd like to hear what you think about the approach
> - I was wondering what would be the best approach to incorporate this logic 
> into postfix

To authenticate receiving systems, consider DANE.  To authenticate
sending systems, don't bother, there's no way to build an open network
that somehow has only the good guys participating.

-- 
    Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to