2016-11-27 1:33 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: > On 26/11/16 13:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2016-11-26 13:44 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>> On 26/11/16 02:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>> 2016-11-26 0:15 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>>>> On 25/11/16 17:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>>>> 2016-11-25 17:13 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>>>>>> -- d/hydrogen.install >>>>>>>> usr/share/hydrogen/data/img >>>>>>> It seems that the only reason for putting this in hydrogen instead of >>>>>>> hydrogen-data is the SVG icon? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes >>>>> >>>>> I don't think you should ship the entire data/img directory in the >>>>> hydrogen package just for this. Either only install that one svg and >>>>> move everything over to the -data package, or duplicate the svg since >>>>> it's only 9kB. >>>> >>>> Ok ... I thought that icon make sense to be installed in binary package >>>> but as hydrogen package can't be installed without hydrogen-data package >>>> all img dir is now moved to -data package. >>> >>> I agree that putting the icon in the main package does make sense - it >>> just seemed like a lot of other stuff could have gone in the data >>> package. One thing is that appstream (ie GNOME software center) requires >>> the icon to be in the main package so hydrogen won't show up at the moment. >> >> Done ;) > > What you've done won't work - you've installed the same file into two > separate packages which have to be installed together.
Now h2-icon.svg file excluded from hydrogen-data package and installed only in hydrogen package. mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
