On 26/11/16 13:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2016-11-26 13:44 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >> On 26/11/16 02:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> 2016-11-26 0:15 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>>> On 25/11/16 17:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>>> 2016-11-25 17:13 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>>>>> -- d/hydrogen.install >>>>>>> usr/share/hydrogen/data/img >>>>>> It seems that the only reason for putting this in hydrogen instead of >>>>>> hydrogen-data is the SVG icon? >>>>> >>>>> Yes >>>> >>>> I don't think you should ship the entire data/img directory in the >>>> hydrogen package just for this. Either only install that one svg and >>>> move everything over to the -data package, or duplicate the svg since >>>> it's only 9kB. >>> >>> Ok ... I thought that icon make sense to be installed in binary package >>> but as hydrogen package can't be installed without hydrogen-data package >>> all img dir is now moved to -data package. >> >> I agree that putting the icon in the main package does make sense - it >> just seemed like a lot of other stuff could have gone in the data >> package. One thing is that appstream (ie GNOME software center) requires >> the icon to be in the main package so hydrogen won't show up at the moment. > > Done ;)
What you've done won't work - you've installed the same file into two separate packages which have to be installed together. James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
