2016-11-26 13:44 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > On 26/11/16 02:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2016-11-26 0:15 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>> On 25/11/16 17:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>> 2016-11-25 17:13 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: >>>>> -- d/hydrogen.install >>>>>> usr/share/hydrogen/data/img >>>>> It seems that the only reason for putting this in hydrogen instead of >>>>> hydrogen-data is the SVG icon? >>>> >>>> Yes >>> >>> I don't think you should ship the entire data/img directory in the >>> hydrogen package just for this. Either only install that one svg and >>> move everything over to the -data package, or duplicate the svg since >>> it's only 9kB. >> >> Ok ... I thought that icon make sense to be installed in binary package >> but as hydrogen package can't be installed without hydrogen-data package >> all img dir is now moved to -data package. > > I agree that putting the icon in the main package does make sense - it > just seemed like a lot of other stuff could have gone in the data > package. One thing is that appstream (ie GNOME software center) requires > the icon to be in the main package so hydrogen won't show up at the moment.
Done ;) best regards mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
