I read the title which contains „easiest/cheapest“ and then you drop names „docker“, "CI which injects“ and „stages" … this invalidates at least „easiest“ and maybe „cheapest“ as well. I think I missed the intent of this mail. So can you give a few more details otherwise it is hard to meet the „easiest on this level of requirements“
Norbert > Am 12.04.2021 um 10:36 schrieb Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works>: > > That is cheap 3e/m is definitely worth considering… but I guess you do have > to take care of your own patching etc right (which isn’t necessarily > horrible, but does require a bit of extra effort to track things). I was > interested in whether the next step up in the food chain using Docker images > that are hosted for you, might lessen the burden a bit? E.g. if your CI > injects a pharo image into the latest “safe” docker image from the community > - then hopefully you are insulated from all of this. It does look like this > is becoming a reality if that dockerize.io soln plays out (I got that > working, its cheap - however they haven’t answered any of my email queries… > so I do wonder how real it actually is). The fallback would definitely be > something like Hetzner or Digital Ocean I guess. > > Tim > >> On 12 Apr 2021, at 08:47, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 12.04.2021 um 04:02 schrieb Jeff Gray <j...@rogerthedog.com>: >>> >>> Considering easiest and cheapest, there's always self hosting, or are you >>> discounting that idea? >>> Most geeks have a bit of spare hardware laying around and broadband >>> up-speeds aren't too bad. >>> I'm guessing that if we are in the $5 a month ball park then we aren't >>> needing a guaranteed up time. >>> >> >> My cloud instance is 3€/month. With an additional 20% amount the instance >> has a backup. And setting it up is way simpler then getting dynamic DNS >> updates and all of that configured. Times have changed a bit. >> >> >> Norbert
