--- Begin Message ---
Op 25-4-2020 om 08:30 schreef Richard
Sargent:
Roelof,
I don't think CRC cards or the GRASP patterns or anything
like that
addresses your immediate needs. Based on other questions
of yours it
seems to me that your problem is not *organising* the
responsibilities in an
OO program, but decomposing a problem into
responsibilities in the first
place. I think this is perhaps the most important part of
programming, and
the hardest to learn, not least because very few of us are
good at teaching
it. We're not very good at teaching it in mathematics
either. I do not think
your issues are anything to do with Pharo, Smalltalk, OOP,
or programming
as such.
One symptom of the general problem that I've noticed is
that I see code as
a very fluid sort of thing where pieces can be moved
around and recombined,
while many people think of code as something solid and
rather brittle.
I was thinking of writing up a short description of what I
was thinking for a
RosettaCode example anyway. Would that help?
Thank you, Richard. I appreciate your offering
this. I am not a teacher, so your help is truly appreciated!
Moment, I have to look if I understand you right.
I think you have some strong points but the last one I did not
understand well.
Do I have to write for example for a exercism challenge a short
description of that problem like people do with rosetta code
challenges and example code ?
Roelof
--- End Message ---
