On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 22:25 Richard O'Keefe <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roelof, I don't think CRC cards or the GRASP patterns or anything like that > addresses your immediate needs. Based on other questions of yours it > seems to me that your problem is not *organising* the responsibilities in > an > OO program, but decomposing a problem into responsibilities in the first > place. I think this is perhaps the most important part of programming, and > the hardest to learn, not least because very few of us are good at teaching > it. We're not very good at teaching it in mathematics either. I do not > think > your issues are anything to do with Pharo, Smalltalk, OOP, or programming > as such. > > One symptom of the general problem that I've noticed is that I see code as > a very fluid sort of thing where pieces can be moved around and recombined, > while many people think of code as something solid and rather brittle. > > I was thinking of writing up a short description of what I was thinking > for a > RosettaCode example anyway. Would that help? > Thank you, Richard. I appreciate your offering this. I am not a teacher, so your help is truly appreciated! > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 23:16, Roelof Wobben via Pharo-users > <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I like Pharo a lot but I hit a wall very often. > > With complex problems I do not see how to solve things in small steps. > > > > Is there somewhere who is willing to mentor me in how I can overcome > > that problem. > > > > Roelof > > > > > >
