On 11/10/17, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote: > A cleaner Pharo will help there. > > To be frank, I found later Pharo releases not inspiring. Bigger, bigger > and bigger with added code, protocol changes, and bugs at will. It is > becoming too complicated for a hobby use of it. > > I decided I will not finish porting DrGeo to P6 or P7, and it will > likely die with P3.
What are the main show stoppers which make it difficult to port your application to P6? > > Pharo should have been clean up to the bones before adding. It was the > initial moto, no? > > > Le 10/11/2017 à 11:14, Marcus Denker a écrit : >> It would be nice if someone who uses it would take the lead >> so we can improve the default that is shipped with Pharo. > > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu > > > >
