Maybe in a different thread...

On 11/10/17, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/17, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote:
>> A cleaner Pharo will help there.
>>
>> To be frank, I found later Pharo releases not inspiring. Bigger, bigger
>> and bigger with added code, protocol changes, and bugs at will. It is
>> becoming too complicated for a hobby use of it.
>>
>> I decided I will not finish porting DrGeo to P6 or P7, and it will
>> likely die with P3.
>
> What are the main show stoppers which make it difficult to port your
> application to P6?
>
>>
>> Pharo should have been clean up to the bones before adding. It was the
>> initial moto, no?
>>
>>
>> Le 10/11/2017 à 11:14, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>> It would be nice if someone who uses it would take the lead
>>> so we can improve the default that is shipped with Pharo.
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Geo
>> http://drgeo.eu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to