But the functionality is there, it's just that it is not loaded by default.
Loading it by default implies wedding Pharo's life cycle with
OS(Sub)Process' one, and having to maintain the possibility of
dependencies to OS(Sub)Process spreading in the entire environment.
What is wrong in executing a simple Metacello command to load it?
-------- Original Message --------
I have a love and hate relationship with Pharo
this one I will put in the hate category
You expect people to use pharo when you do not offer functionality
they come to expect from the language they already use and not even
offer an altervative, say a library with similar command line
functionality (See Scale).
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name
<mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote:
> Am 28.10.2016 um 13:17 schrieb Dimitris Chloupis
<kilon.al...@gmail.com <mailto:kilon.al...@gmail.com>>:
>
> I just noticed that OSProcess misses from Pharo 6 image, it was
supposed to be replaced by OSSubProcess but this not in the image
either ? What we suppose to use to execute bash from inside pharo ?
It was never in the image. You need to install it in order to use it.
Norbert
