Hi,
On 07/09/16 13:39, stepharo wrote:
We should not have "The Pharo Way" (TM) or "No way!"... suddenly
Markus talk about feedback loops comes to mind, particularly the
slide on page 53, regarding "An open source smalltalk ignoring all
community contributions"[2]. This is far for being the case in this
community and we can keep that scenario at safe distance, if we show
options. So, dual license is an option, git is an option, markdown is
an option. Pharo as a place with options is one where Pharo can
fulfill its vision for more people. Let's make these options visible
and figure out the way the work better for a wider community.
It is amazing how you like talking.
Yes. I like. Is the way to know unwritten history. Not all the people in
the community know the details as you do, so talking is the way of going
out of misconceptions, like mine about dual license or state positions,
like why I don't use Pillar. The "it has been discussed, this is our
way, take or leave it" doesn't help in understanding way. So yes, I'm
all about encouraging dialog/talk if it helps to understand.
Bye,
Offray
