Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

[btc]

Robert Shiplett wrote: "BTW, Nautilus is stable and used daily by the whole community." This still rankles ... I have been a Smalltalker since long before Squeak and have been using Pharo since Seaside first ran on it - if not earlier than that ... I also received from another on the mail list "and in fact I cannot reproduce it." "And in fact" is such a wicked rhetorical move ... in a game I have lost all interest in playing now that I am retired. It may take me a lot of effort to track these 2 bugs down as far as "Follow these steps to reproduce" .. but then I am not a CONSORTIUM member ( I used to pay big bucks for Smalltalk, back in the day ) so may be I am too far outside the "whole community".... btw. I will spare you my plot's view of the term "stable" and the notion of stability ... and will be sure I rename key files as I go along ... [ why are we still having to rename files such as these when able to run multiple images in the same dir ? ] ciao btw, have you tried PharoLauncher? It is a very cool way of managing multiple images. https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoLauncher-Win-Package/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/pharo-ci/pharo_installer.exe cheers -ben On 26 February 2014 04:36, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett <grshipl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for > receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil > > I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back. > > Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ? I can't reproduce this either, please be more specific. BTW, Nautilus is stable and used daily by the whole community. Of course, it is a complex piece of code with lots of UI and system interactions, so issues are always possible. Sven