On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility, > I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks > breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice > any improved ease-of-use.
So, what you are basically saying is to switch currtid_byreloid() to become a function local to tid.c. And then have just currtid_byrelname() and currtid_for_view() call that, right? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
