On 2020-09-03 12:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:11:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
From what I can see on this thread, we could just remove currtid() per
the arguments of the RETURNING ctid clause supported since PG 8.2, but
it would make more sense to me to just remove both currtid/currtid2()
at once.
The CF bot is complaining, so here is a rebase for the main patch.
Opinions are welcome about the arguments of upthread.
It appears that currtid2() is still used, so we ought to keep it.
