Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Indeed, this could go. There is a recursive call for views, but in
> order to maintain compatibility with that we can just remove one
> function and move the second to use a regclass as argument, like the
> attached, while removing setLastTid(). Any thoughts?
Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility,
I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks
breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice
any improved ease-of-use.
regards, tom lane
