Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > What about cutting the cake in two and just remove > currtid() then?
+1. That'd still let us get rid of setLastTid() which is the ugliest part of the thing, IMO. regards, tom lane
Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > What about cutting the cake in two and just remove > currtid() then?
+1. That'd still let us get rid of setLastTid() which is the ugliest part of the thing, IMO. regards, tom lane