On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:53:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, if pgODBC were not using it at all then I think it'd be fine > to get rid of, but if it still contains calls then we cannot. > The suggestion upthread that those calls might be unreachable > is interesting, but it seems unproven.
Yeah, I am not 100% sure that there are no code paths calling currtid2(), and the ODBC is too obscure to me to get to a clear conclusion. currtid() though, is a different deal thanks to RETURNING. What about cutting the cake in two and just remove currtid() then? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
