The binaries: * clusterdb * createdb * createuser * dropdb * dropuser * reindexdb * vacuumdb
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:13 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 3/20/19 2:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2019-Mar-20, Euler Taveira wrote: > > > >> Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 14:57, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu: > >>> > >>> We managed to get rid of createlang and droplang in v10, and there > >>> hasn't been that much push-back about it. So maybe there could be > >>> a move to remove createuser/dropuser? Or at least rename them to > >>> pg_createuser and pg_dropuser. But I think this was discussed > >>> (again) during the v10 cycle, and we couldn't agree to do more than > >>> get rid of createlang/droplang. > > > > Previous discussion: > > https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExPrfPH5K5qM=zst7tvfyace+i5qja6bfwckkyrh8m...@mail.gmail.com > > > >> Votes? +1 to remove createuser/dropuser (and also createdb/dropdb as I > >> said in the other email). However, if we don't have sufficient votes, > >> let's at least consider a 'pg_' prefix. > > > > I vote to keep these rename these utilities to have a pg_ prefix and to > > simultaneously install symlinks for their current names, so that nothing > > breaks. > > This sounds like a reasonable plan, pending which binaries we feel to do > that with. > > Pardon this naive question as I have not used such systems in awhile, > but would this work on systems that do not support symlinks? > > Jonathan >
