On 2019-Mar-20, Euler Taveira wrote: > Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 14:57, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu: > > > > We managed to get rid of createlang and droplang in v10, and there > > hasn't been that much push-back about it. So maybe there could be > > a move to remove createuser/dropuser? Or at least rename them to > > pg_createuser and pg_dropuser. But I think this was discussed > > (again) during the v10 cycle, and we couldn't agree to do more than > > get rid of createlang/droplang.
Previous discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExPrfPH5K5qM=zst7tvfyace+i5qja6bfwckkyrh8m...@mail.gmail.com > Votes? +1 to remove createuser/dropuser (and also createdb/dropdb as I > said in the other email). However, if we don't have sufficient votes, > let's at least consider a 'pg_' prefix. I vote to keep these rename these utilities to have a pg_ prefix and to simultaneously install symlinks for their current names, so that nothing breaks. [In a couple of releases we could patch them so that they print a deprecation warning to stderr if they're invoked without the prefix.] -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
