On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:02:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > So there seems like a real risk that taking away createuser would > result in security holes, not just annoying-but-trivial script update > work. That puts me more in the camp of "if we're going to do anything, > rename it with a pg_ prefix" than "if we're going to do anything, > remove it".
Removing it would be a bad idea as it is very easy to mess up with things in such cases. As you mentioned, renaming the tools now would create more pain than actually solving things, so that's a bad idea anyway. I would be curious to hear the reason why such tool names have been chosen from the start. The tools have been switched to C in 9e0ab71 from 2003, have been introduced by Peter Eisentraut as of 240e4c9 from 1999, and I cannot spot the thread from the time where this was discussed. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
