> On 24 Mar 2022, at 14:07, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 24.03.22 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: >> The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent. When the >> code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already >> had the comment. After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural >> ignoring the comment. It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5. > > I have removed the comment.
I was just typing a reply to your upthread answer that we should just remove the comment then, so a retroactive +1 on this =) -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
