On 24.03.22 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent. When the code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already had the comment. After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural ignoring the comment. It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5.
I have removed the comment.
