On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 2:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 24 Mar 2022, at 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent. When the > > code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already > > had the comment. After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural > > ignoring the comment. It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5. > > Following the bouncing ball, that seems like a reasonable conclusion, and > removing the plural form should be fine to reduce translator work.
Yes, the singular version of the message isn't required at all as numReportedClient > 1. Hence I proposed to remove errmsg_plural and singular version. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
